Beta_mle
11-30 08:20 AM
Is there a link to the original source data, ie the government website referenced?
wallpaper embryos at 5 weeks. images of
yabadaba
12-20 07:17 PM
Thanks Purgan
LostInGCProcess
09-02 10:53 AM
^^bump^^
2011 normal 8-week embryo with
solaris27
10-17 12:33 PM
http://www.maggio-kattar.com/
more...
diptam
07-17 10:15 PM
Once your GC gets approved , thenit may be difficult for your wife to file
Hi, I am in same boat as you. I tried to find infomation & reality is 485 for future spouse can be filed only if the PD becomes current.
Hi, I am in same boat as you. I tried to find infomation & reality is 485 for future spouse can be filed only if the PD becomes current.
_939e274dd5.jpg "4d sonogram of a 5 week fetus")
kondur_007
06-03 11:06 AM
http://www.travel.state.gov/pdf/EmploymentDemandUsedForCutOffDates.pdf
Each month visa bulletin is preceded with a demand data. So bulletin should come today or tomorrow.
Check out data for China. It shows significant reduction from last month. Expectations are low for India but China will advance a lot in July.
This is done in preparation for the spill over (fall down); they have used up all of "china's own" numbers and now they will actually retrogress EB2 China (to move it along with EB2 India) to distribute spillover (fall down); the VB will come with a "long explanation" as to why the retrogression for EB2 China despite of low demand....
Stay tuned! :)
Each month visa bulletin is preceded with a demand data. So bulletin should come today or tomorrow.
Check out data for China. It shows significant reduction from last month. Expectations are low for India but China will advance a lot in July.
This is done in preparation for the spill over (fall down); they have used up all of "china's own" numbers and now they will actually retrogress EB2 China (to move it along with EB2 India) to distribute spillover (fall down); the VB will come with a "long explanation" as to why the retrogression for EB2 China despite of low demand....
Stay tuned! :)
more...
bigboy007
07-28 10:54 PM
Everyone wants to get to news... There are many options BUT h1 or L1 i have seen IT companies doing those when H1 are dried out...
but Phaneesh is "he" ( the one quoted in the article not Shiela) anyways chill out... :)
BTW Murthy is not he.
but Phaneesh is "he" ( the one quoted in the article not Shiela) anyways chill out... :)
BTW Murthy is not he.
2010 six-week-old human embryo.
neeidd
08-05 12:14 PM
Hi Guys,
Based on other threads on this forum, I see a lot of I-485 approvals(EB2 I) at TSC for receipt numbers starting SRC# and whose PD is current . Just wondering if any one got I-485 approved whose application is a transferred from Vermont(EAC) to TSC?
Please shed some light on this!
Btw, my receipt date is 07/07 (EAC). PD current. Case transferred to TSC with a receipt date of 09/11.
Thanks
Based on other threads on this forum, I see a lot of I-485 approvals(EB2 I) at TSC for receipt numbers starting SRC# and whose PD is current . Just wondering if any one got I-485 approved whose application is a transferred from Vermont(EAC) to TSC?
Please shed some light on this!
Btw, my receipt date is 07/07 (EAC). PD current. Case transferred to TSC with a receipt date of 09/11.
Thanks
more...
Blog Feeds
07-09 12:30 PM
AILA Leadership Has Just Posted the Following:
Senator Sessions cannot leave his hands off of E-Verify. Now in "stealth" mode, Senator Sessions has slyly introduced an E-Verify amendment (SB 1371) during today's full Senate vote on the DHS appropriations bill.
The Sessions amendment calls for a permanent reauthorization of the Basic Pilot/E-Verify program, and mandates its use for all federal contractors and subcontractors - including the verification of all existing employees. This amounts to a massive expansion of a program that is still not ready for prime-time.
We must call our Senators and tell them to oppose this sneak attack by Senator Sessions for the following reasons:
It would impose exorbitant costs on businesses at a time when our economy is most vulnerable:
An economic analysis commissioned by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce
concluded that the net societal costs of the program would be $10 billion a year
� a cost that would be felt disproportionately by small businesses. It would make Basic Pilot/E-Verify permanent without addressing its well documented database inaccuracies:
A 2007 independent evaluation of the program commissioned by DHS found that
the Basic Pilot/E-Verify database �is still not sufficiently up to date� to meet
the requirements for �accurate verification.�
SSA has estimated that if Basic Pilot/E-Verify were to become mandatory and
the databases were not improved, SSA database errors alone could result in 3.6
million workers a year being misidentified as not authorized for employment.
This would result in 6 out of every 100 workers having to visit an SSA office to
correct their records or lose their job.
It would force workers and businesses to pay a high price for Basic Pilot/E-Verify's inaccuracies:
Queries submitted to Basic Pilot/E-Verify by Intel Corporation in 2008 resulted
in nearly 13 percent of all workers being initially flagged as unauthorized for
employment. All of these workers were cleared by Basic Pilot/E-Verify as
work-authorized, but only after �significant investment of time and money�
and �lost productivity.�We urge all AILA members to call their Congressman today and oppose the Sessions amendment (SB 1371). Don't let Senator Session's stealth tactics create a nationwide crisis for employers!
https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/186823568153827945-5839069238864574507?l=ailaleadership.blogspot.com
More... (http://ailaleadership.blogspot.com/2009/07/there-he-goes-again-sessions-and-e.html)
Senator Sessions cannot leave his hands off of E-Verify. Now in "stealth" mode, Senator Sessions has slyly introduced an E-Verify amendment (SB 1371) during today's full Senate vote on the DHS appropriations bill.
The Sessions amendment calls for a permanent reauthorization of the Basic Pilot/E-Verify program, and mandates its use for all federal contractors and subcontractors - including the verification of all existing employees. This amounts to a massive expansion of a program that is still not ready for prime-time.
We must call our Senators and tell them to oppose this sneak attack by Senator Sessions for the following reasons:
It would impose exorbitant costs on businesses at a time when our economy is most vulnerable:
An economic analysis commissioned by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce
concluded that the net societal costs of the program would be $10 billion a year
� a cost that would be felt disproportionately by small businesses. It would make Basic Pilot/E-Verify permanent without addressing its well documented database inaccuracies:
A 2007 independent evaluation of the program commissioned by DHS found that
the Basic Pilot/E-Verify database �is still not sufficiently up to date� to meet
the requirements for �accurate verification.�
SSA has estimated that if Basic Pilot/E-Verify were to become mandatory and
the databases were not improved, SSA database errors alone could result in 3.6
million workers a year being misidentified as not authorized for employment.
This would result in 6 out of every 100 workers having to visit an SSA office to
correct their records or lose their job.
It would force workers and businesses to pay a high price for Basic Pilot/E-Verify's inaccuracies:
Queries submitted to Basic Pilot/E-Verify by Intel Corporation in 2008 resulted
in nearly 13 percent of all workers being initially flagged as unauthorized for
employment. All of these workers were cleared by Basic Pilot/E-Verify as
work-authorized, but only after �significant investment of time and money�
and �lost productivity.�We urge all AILA members to call their Congressman today and oppose the Sessions amendment (SB 1371). Don't let Senator Session's stealth tactics create a nationwide crisis for employers!
https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/186823568153827945-5839069238864574507?l=ailaleadership.blogspot.com
More... (http://ailaleadership.blogspot.com/2009/07/there-he-goes-again-sessions-and-e.html)
hair as if 3-4 week old embryos
neeidd
08-05 12:20 PM
We will not see any approvals unless we act togther and campaign for our cause. Please join us. More details at
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=20657
The thread you linked for I-140 delays. I am asking about I-485 approvals :)
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=20657
The thread you linked for I-140 delays. I am asking about I-485 approvals :)
more...
immi2006
01-05 10:02 AM
Folks,
Without much emphasis - will this not add weight atleast to show what the Tech companies have the power ? The founders are immigrants
Link # 0
http://nl.newsbank.com/nl-search/we/Archives?p_action=doc&p_docid=11678789AF708BE8&p_docnum=2
San Jose Mercury News (CA) January 4, 2007 Section: Front
VALLEY'S NEW LEADERS COMING FROM OVERSEAS
STUDY SHOWS IMMIGRANTS HELP CREATE MORE THAN HALF OF AREA'S START-UPS - JOHN BOUDREAU, Mercury News
Sudhakar Muddu left everything familiar in his homeland of India in 1990 to attend Yale University on a post-graduate scholarship. He later worked for IBM and Silicon Graphics.
Link # 1
http://cbs5.com/topstories/local_story_004195228.html
California Can Thank Google For Budget Windfall
(AP) SACRAMENTO Someday, this era may simply be known as The Google Years.
California, whose budget revenue slides up and down like a yo-yo with changes in capital gains and stock options, is once again counting on outsized income tax filings from a handful of tech executives to help balance its budget. For this wave, California can largely thank Google Inc.
After cashing in more than 9 million shares valued at $3.7 billion last year, 16 Google insiders will owe the Golden State as much as $380 million in taxes -- enough to cover the salaries of more than 3,000 state workers. - And countless other employees in Silicon Valley,
Without much emphasis - will this not add weight atleast to show what the Tech companies have the power ? The founders are immigrants
Link # 0
http://nl.newsbank.com/nl-search/we/Archives?p_action=doc&p_docid=11678789AF708BE8&p_docnum=2
San Jose Mercury News (CA) January 4, 2007 Section: Front
VALLEY'S NEW LEADERS COMING FROM OVERSEAS
STUDY SHOWS IMMIGRANTS HELP CREATE MORE THAN HALF OF AREA'S START-UPS - JOHN BOUDREAU, Mercury News
Sudhakar Muddu left everything familiar in his homeland of India in 1990 to attend Yale University on a post-graduate scholarship. He later worked for IBM and Silicon Graphics.
Link # 1
http://cbs5.com/topstories/local_story_004195228.html
California Can Thank Google For Budget Windfall
(AP) SACRAMENTO Someday, this era may simply be known as The Google Years.
California, whose budget revenue slides up and down like a yo-yo with changes in capital gains and stock options, is once again counting on outsized income tax filings from a handful of tech executives to help balance its budget. For this wave, California can largely thank Google Inc.
After cashing in more than 9 million shares valued at $3.7 billion last year, 16 Google insiders will owe the Golden State as much as $380 million in taxes -- enough to cover the salaries of more than 3,000 state workers. - And countless other employees in Silicon Valley,
hot 2011 5 week embryo,
aries22
07-18 09:16 AM
Are you saying client company will not pay for the expenses or it will not sponsor H1 visa? If the Client Company does not sponsor H1 visa, i do not think you an sponsor yourself.You can pay for your expenses if client company sponsors H1 visa.
Thanks for your reply.
I read that with a signed offer letter from the company we can transfer.If they give me the letter and not pay any expenses can I still transfer?
Thanks for your reply.
I read that with a signed offer letter from the company we can transfer.If they give me the letter and not pay any expenses can I still transfer?
more...
house ||21 week baby boy fetus
sln2001
08-25 07:57 PM
One of my friend was in a similar situtation.His attorney filed h1 extension providng the proof that a previous labor application was denied and the new one has been filed and is pending . He was able to get his h1 extended for an year.His situation was far worse , he had only a month left on his h1.
tattoo 4d sonogram of a 5 week fetus
askreddy
07-26 12:49 AM
Hi
Which part of address change trigger RFE
1) Submitting AR11
OR
2) Changing address for pending 485.
Will any one at USCIS does anything/do processing/look into it, if you just submit AR11.
Thanks
Which part of address change trigger RFE
1) Submitting AR11
OR
2) Changing address for pending 485.
Will any one at USCIS does anything/do processing/look into it, if you just submit AR11.
Thanks
more...
pictures 2010 images of 5 week fetus.
sandeeps92049
08-07 12:44 AM
Hi,
I have H1 that is valid till 2011 but when I entered using H1 ( I had EAD and AP also), the visa officer gave i-94 only till Jun 3rd 2009. I did not notice this error at that time. I realized this when my attorney pointed out this while applying for my new AP. The attorney suggested that I should go out of the country and re enter on EAD/AP and start working on EAD. What are my options ?
1) My EAD is valid till 2010
2) My current H1 is valid till 2011
3) My current AP is Valid till August 28 2009
4) My I-94 expired on June 3rd 2009.
5) My H1 visa stamp expired on May 2009
Should I go to Canada or Mexico and re-enter US with EAD/AP before my AP expires to start working on EAD and avoid any "out of status" issues ?
Does Canada Mexico ask for valid VISA and I-94 to get a visitor visa ?
Should I go to India(my home country) and re-enter US before my AP expires to keep my status ?
Appreciate a quick response as my AP is about to expire.
I have H1 that is valid till 2011 but when I entered using H1 ( I had EAD and AP also), the visa officer gave i-94 only till Jun 3rd 2009. I did not notice this error at that time. I realized this when my attorney pointed out this while applying for my new AP. The attorney suggested that I should go out of the country and re enter on EAD/AP and start working on EAD. What are my options ?
1) My EAD is valid till 2010
2) My current H1 is valid till 2011
3) My current AP is Valid till August 28 2009
4) My I-94 expired on June 3rd 2009.
5) My H1 visa stamp expired on May 2009
Should I go to Canada or Mexico and re-enter US with EAD/AP before my AP expires to start working on EAD and avoid any "out of status" issues ?
Does Canada Mexico ask for valid VISA and I-94 to get a visitor visa ?
Should I go to India(my home country) and re-enter US before my AP expires to keep my status ?
Appreciate a quick response as my AP is about to expire.
dresses 2011 images of 5 week fetus.
jkamel5
04-07 04:48 AM
Hi,
I have 2 lawyers to select from. Both are good. One of them is the lawyer company (his office locate in the same city) which is the most expensive. The other lawyer is really good and his expenses is pretty good.
My question is that: Is it better to stuck with the company lawyer as he can handle the perm better. That may because he knows well where to advertise? Or it does not matter? I am just worried that the lawyer that live in another state will not know very well about the city and where he should advertise.
As anyone think, I also want to make sure that he does not over advertise such that we may get many applicants?
Please advise me if I should stuck with the company lawyer or it does not matter?
Thanks
I have 2 lawyers to select from. Both are good. One of them is the lawyer company (his office locate in the same city) which is the most expensive. The other lawyer is really good and his expenses is pretty good.
My question is that: Is it better to stuck with the company lawyer as he can handle the perm better. That may because he knows well where to advertise? Or it does not matter? I am just worried that the lawyer that live in another state will not know very well about the city and where he should advertise.
As anyone think, I also want to make sure that he does not over advertise such that we may get many applicants?
Please advise me if I should stuck with the company lawyer or it does not matter?
Thanks
more...
makeup This is what a human embryo
MatsP
June 14th, 2010, 01:41 PM
I have never taken photos with the camera actually under water, but I have taken pictures of fish in aquarium, and to my knowledge water movement appear to not matter for the clarity of the image. This is as long as the water is clear in itself, and of course, there is no air bubbles or some other "stuff" moving in the water - if you have lots of air-bubbles, they will leave traces in flowing (or still) water if the shutter speed is short.
--
Mats
--
Mats
girlfriend 21 week old fetus holds
Pagal
07-05 03:28 AM
Hello,
There are many approved evaluation services that would provide you with certification of your MSc as compared to US programs like World Education Services - International Education Intelligence (http://www.wes.org)
Please be aware about rip-offs on the web who may not be the approved agents...good luck!
There are many approved evaluation services that would provide you with certification of your MSc as compared to US programs like World Education Services - International Education Intelligence (http://www.wes.org)
Please be aware about rip-offs on the web who may not be the approved agents...good luck!
hairstyles the first 8 week of human
desi3933
03-05 04:15 PM
Hi
My 140 got approved and 485 is in pending state.I have my EAD and also valid H1.
1.Can I add my spouse to my GC status when PD is not current?My spouse is on H1B visa.
2.If I start using EAD, is it still possible to add spouse or I should maintain valid H1 status?
Can you please respond back ASAP.Thanks.
Your spouse can file I-485 only when your PD is current. Until (s)he needs to maintain H1/H4 status.
My 140 got approved and 485 is in pending state.I have my EAD and also valid H1.
1.Can I add my spouse to my GC status when PD is not current?My spouse is on H1B visa.
2.If I start using EAD, is it still possible to add spouse or I should maintain valid H1 status?
Can you please respond back ASAP.Thanks.
Your spouse can file I-485 only when your PD is current. Until (s)he needs to maintain H1/H4 status.
anandrajesh
06-22 11:04 AM
Congradulations again to all those IV memeber who are getting Green card approvals and goodluck to all those members who are able to file their I485 and get EAD, just to be out of H1B /H4 clutches and one more step closer to green card
As current drastic visa movment proved the fact that for IV members main issue is not current law but itz implimentation. a change in law will certainly help, but thatz not our big problem
I would like to discuss your IV future agend with current situation, Please post your opinion how you think IV should procede based on current situations.
I belive IV should now concentrate more on making sure current law is implimented in a more effeciant way, make sure USCIS does not waste any visa numbers, we need to push for speeding citizenship processes and makeup for loss time during retrogression
IV should stop chasing CIR which has nothing for us and itz very controversial
IV is for legals and we should concentrate only on whatz good for us
I really appreciate core members opinion
by the way I got my approval for my I485
Sweet !!! Congratulations on getting ur 485 approved.
eb3india becomes GCIndia :)
As current drastic visa movment proved the fact that for IV members main issue is not current law but itz implimentation. a change in law will certainly help, but thatz not our big problem
I would like to discuss your IV future agend with current situation, Please post your opinion how you think IV should procede based on current situations.
I belive IV should now concentrate more on making sure current law is implimented in a more effeciant way, make sure USCIS does not waste any visa numbers, we need to push for speeding citizenship processes and makeup for loss time during retrogression
IV should stop chasing CIR which has nothing for us and itz very controversial
IV is for legals and we should concentrate only on whatz good for us
I really appreciate core members opinion
by the way I got my approval for my I485
Sweet !!! Congratulations on getting ur 485 approved.
eb3india becomes GCIndia :)
JunRN
08-10 06:34 PM
I am waiting too...it may come on Monday instead and so is the 'U' in the Visa Bulletin.
Không có nhận xét nào:
Đăng nhận xét